This explains why WordPress says it's okay to link to StackExchange. Or is it so? "We need to identify something that isn't a" commercial "website, but it's not even posted on our personal blog. This is allowed. For example, either StackOverflow or the StackExchange website. It's not really a non-profit website, but it's completely neutral to what you see on WordPress.org. " By the author of that statement, "neutral" means that the link to Stack Exchange is a natural occurrence, not something that Stack Exchange workers have added to the WordPress document itself.
She explains further: "This isn't saying ghost mannequin effect service that being'neutral'in this regard is a requirement, but simply pointing out that I'm not interested in trying to exploit the opportunity to display the link on wp.org. I'm just there. " The WordPress people who came up with the policy didn't really think about making the document so convenient that they wouldn't need external links because they were still allowed to link to Stack Exchange. If the WordPress administration team came from the point of view that the WordPress documentation should be useful and doesn't require external links, they wouldn't have allowed links to StackExchange. Is the new WordPress policy unfair? Joost de Valk, the founder of the Yoast SEO WordPress plugin, said that many companies that have helped WordPress behind the scenes will be treated the same as companies that do nothing to WordPress. .. This is what Joost said: "I would like to avoid discussing prejudice. But I think your assumption here is wrong.
You say there is no "prejudice" if you are not linked to a for-profit company. I think we're all inherently prejudiced, as some companies do a lot for the WordPress community and others don't. Companies that contribute a lot to WordPress used to get some links, so they were doing some promotions to benefit from the fact that they were contributing. By removing it from them, you are basically treating a company that does not give back as a company that gives back. I think this is just wrong. So I very much disagree with this decision. " advertisement Continue reading below Another member of the WordPress community has expressed similar opposition. His claim was that the new policy was discriminatory and arbitrarily negative about commercial sites.